A refusal that reverts leaves no evidence it happened.
Every compliance system on-chain can prove what it permitted. None can prove
what it stopped — Chainlink's own ACE docs state it indexes only
successful transactions, and a reverted transfer leaves no record anywhere. This reads
a ledger that records refusals as durably as allows, and translates
each refusal from a hex selector into plain English.
Connect
Read-only. No wallet, no signing, no transaction is ever sent from this page.
Decisions recorded
—
total
every evaluation, allowed or not
—
allowed
transfer was permitted
—
refused
blocked by a compliance rule
—
mechanical
insufficient balance — not a gate decision
—
not observable
gate could not be seen; no claim made
Ledger
Recorded eligibility decisions, newest first
#
Outcome
Reason
Asset
From → To
Amount
Block seen
Attestor
Nothing loaded yet.
An empty ledger is not evidence that nothing was refused — it means nothing has been
published here yet.
Refusal lexicon
Selector
Signature
Kind
Meaning
Two selectors — 0x9742a8f1 and 0x51d86cca — resisted about
2,000 candidate signatures and are still unknown. They are shown as
unknown rather than guessed. An unknown selector is never assumed mechanical, because
that would let an unrecognised compliance error license a verdict.
What this cannot tell you
It measures the code layer only. A control enforced by an
off-chain signed order, a compliance oracle or a front-end is invisible here and is
reported not observable, never decorative.
A record is only as good as its attestor. Anyone may publish to
the ledger, so the attestor is part of every record. Filter on it.
It says nothing about whether an asset is real.
21 of ~22 documented RWA failures happened off-chain. RealT's ledger was perfect
while the houses were vacant.
Nothing here is a rating or advice. These are measurements of
code and state at a named block, reproducible by anyone.